Showing posts with label Kindle Unlimited. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kindle Unlimited. Show all posts

Monday, December 4, 2017

Review: Regarding Anna (by Florence Osmund)



My Rating: 2 stars

This was another book that was on my list to read for the A to Z Author Challenge – it was for the letter "O" which is one of those letters that I had a hard time finding a book/author that matched.  Coming up against the end of the year, this was one of the last few books I had left to complete this challenge and in all honesty, I regretted a bit saving this one until the end, reason being that if this had been earlier on in the year, I would have DNF'ed this book without hesitation.  Instead, I forced myself to finish it, as there was no way this late in the game that I was going to start all over again and look for another book, especially with the time crunch this month and the already little time that I have for reading.

As is probably obvious from my rating, I did not like this book at all.  Reading the summary, I thought the premise had potential and even after finishing the book, I still think the same, however the problem was in the author's poor execution of the story.  First of all, I had a lot of problems with the writing – I don't know how else to put this, but the writing came across very "elementary" to me, almost feeling as though a teenager wrote it for a writing class and didn't do a good job getting it proofread before turning it in.  There were a lot of grammar and sentence structure errors, misspellings, punctuation errors, etc. – a huge distraction for me, as I found myself trying to correct the errors in my mind as I went, which made it hard to concentrate on the story itself.  But in the scheme of things, this actually turned out to be a relatively "minor" issue given that the problems with the writing went far beyond merely grammar and spelling mistakes – the inconsistent and overly-simplified style of the writing was a bigger problem that made this a very tedious read for me. There was way too much of what I would characterize as "fluff"—space fillers that had little to nothing to do with the plot, which bogged down the story tremendously.  The author spent a lot of time describing things and events that didn't matter, details that, as the reader, we did not need to know (for example – I'm paraphrasing here but many of the sentences were similar to this: 'I started the car.  It took me 30 minutes to drive to [name of the restaurant]. When I arrived, I sat down and ordered the breakfast special from the menu.  It was the best breakfast I had in years. After that, I paid the bill, got back in the car and drove home.  Exhausted, I went to bed.  The next morning I woke up at 4:15 and started my day').  There's more though -- the main character in the book, Grace, is a private investigator (I will come back to this part later) and instead of focusing on the main storyline of Grace wanting to find out about her past, the author spent an excessive amount of time describing in detail each of the cases that Grace took on (from names of all the people involved in the cases to the various actions Grace took to "handle" the case for her clients – such as following so-and-so in her car and watching them walk into a hotel, then come out x number of minutes later with someone else, etc.).  I would be ok with this type of detail  if this were, say, a police procedural or a true "mystery" novel with legitimate cases to solve – but unfortunately, this was not the case at all, as NONE of the cases had anything to do with the main storyline about Grace's personal quest to find out whether her "hunch" about her identity was true or not.  To be honest, I feel like 50% of this book could have been cut and the story would not have been affected in the least. There were also a lot of "coincidences," things that happened that were just way too contrived, convenient, and I felt like throughout the entire book, I had to suspend disbelief in order to get through the story.

I've seen this book classified under "historical fiction" and I can tell you right now that classification is wrong based on the way this book was written.  Supposedly, the setting of the story is in the 1960s, with references to an earlier time period for some of the characters (the character mentioned in the title, Anna, her story actually took place in the 1940s), but if you were to tell me that this story actually takes place in 2017, I would absolutely believe it.  That's because the style of the writing was way too modern and most of the word choices did not seem to fit the setting.  At one point, I felt like I was reading a YA novel – books that I'm definitely not the target audience for.  A few examples:  words like "no kidding" (which was so over-used throughout the book that it verged on the point of being annoying), "what the hell," "crap" (and a bunch of other modern day curse words), "wuss," "potty break" (which was used to describe a grown man taking a break from his work to use the restroom), etc. – and that's just scratching the surface!  I did not feel a sense of time and place with the story at all, which is obviously a huge problem. 

In terms of the characters – well, all I'm going to say is that there was very little character development.  A bunch of characters were thrown in throughout the story, but none of them were developed, with many of them being "side" characters that had nothing to do with the main story.  Also, the way the author wrote the main character Grace made her utterly unlikeable.  From the getgo, I was annoyed with Grace and her unsubstantiated "insistence" that Anna was her mother and her adopted parents had perhaps "kidnapped" her when she was a baby and even though they loved her, she could not shake away the possibility that they were somehow involved in her birth mother's death – this is the premise that was reiterated throughout the entire story and it seemed that Grace's main goal throughout the entire narrative was to "confirm" that these "assumptions" were true. What irritated me most about Grace though is that she was a private investigator, a supposedly "smart" woman, but yet everything she did was completely opposite of what someone who had gone to "law enforcement school" as she put it, would actually do.  Not only did Grace have no common sense whatsoever, she also had no investigative skills beyond rudimentary level and often ended up in disastrous situations due to her own (self-admitted) stupid and stubborn actions.  In fact, at multiple points throughout the story (way more times than needed), Grace would actually comment how bad her investigative skills were (i.e. she repeated every couple pages – 'so much for having a private investigator license' or 'so much for going to law enforcement school') – it was especially annoying given that the entire narrative was told from Grace's first person point of view, so the reader had no choice but to endure her constant whining and flip-floppy decision-making.

In the end, after pushing myself to finish this book, I decided to rate it 2 stars.  This might sound generous given all the issues I had with this book, but in all fairness, there truly was a legitimate "mystery" in here in terms of Anna's backstory and there were also a few twists and turns worked in that made that part of the story interesting enough to want to find out what happened to her.  In the hands of a more capable writer, I think this would have ended up being a good, intriguing story – unfortunately though, that wasn't the case here and after about the halfway mark, I skimmed the rest of the way through the book.  While this is a book I would not recommend, I seem to be one of the outliers here, as there were some highly rated reviews for this book from other readers so perhaps check those out before deciding.


Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Review: Last Things (by Betta Ferrendelli)

My Rating: 2.5 stars

This was a book I became aware of while browsing Kindle's lending library – upon reading the summary, the story sounded interesting so I decided to check it out. Overall, the story itself was not bad – in fact, there was actually a lot of potential for this to have turned into something great. Unfortunately, due to poor execution, a story that would have otherwise been emotionally moving and heart-wrenching turned out bland and lacking in emotional depth (for me at least).

To me, the main problem with this book was the writing, which was very inconsistent and distracting. Some parts were written in a way that felt choppy and abrupt while other sections I felt attempted to go the "literary" route with overly descriptive paragraphs that were unnecessary and didn't do much to further the plot, but then there were other parts that flowed well. This made the story come across as being all over the place and "true" character development swallowed up by stuff that didn't need to be there. All the characters in the book endure one dramatic/tragic event after another and I'm sure the expected reaction from us as readers was to sympathize and feel for them, to be moved by their plight, to applaud their ability to overcome in the face of adversity and the relationships that formed as a result. I'm sorry, but throughout the entire time I was reading, I just couldn't get into it – I found it difficult to connect with the characters on an emotional level, even though I know I was supposed to (and from the many glowing reviews this book received on Amazon, it sounded like everyone else did feel an emotional connection except for me). The main characters themselves, despite being inconsistently developed, were actually likable enough – the friendship between Bridgette and Alexis was admirable, Eda Mae and Blanche were there when they needed to be, and the little girl Eden was indeed very sweet. However, the situations they go through were too contrived, especially as it relates to the main character Bridgette – it was almost like the author was trying to throw every bad thing possible at this character and show how she was still able to rebound from all of it and therefore make the better person she becomes at the end more significant. In a way, it was too formulaic and predictable to be believable. I also felt as though Bridgette's story wasn't actually being "told" in the relatable way that it needed to be, but rather, it was merely being "reported" by an outside party similar to what we would see in a newspaper article.

Overall, I felt like the author tried too hard to give us an emotionally packed story and in doing so, crammed way too many "heavy" emotional topics into the story without giving adequate time to explore each one and tie it back to the development of the characters. Also, the last third or so of the book was essentially "fluff" that I ended up skimming through, as I felt like the author had already said everything she had intended to say a few pages back and so the rest was unnecessary – the loose ends could've been tied up in another page or two instead of dragging on for another 3 or 4 chapters.

Basically, I don't regret reading this book and I definitely don't feel it was a completely wasted effort, but if the book had gone on for longer (324 pages was way too long as it is), I very possibly would've abandoned it in favor of a better written book (and one that didn't have as many grammar/spelling/sentence structure errors too, though it wasn't significant enough of an issue to make the book unreadable for me).

(Read in January 2017)

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Review: Tiger Moms vs Western Parenting: Is There a Happy Medium? (By Dori Nolan)

My Rating: 2 stars

First off, before I even go into whether I liked this book or not, I have to ask the question – did anyone edit this book before publishing it?? The number of grammar, spelling, and sentence structure errors I found in this book was ridiculous to the point that it really affected my ability to get through the book. The Kindle edition was only 99 pages, which normally would be a very quick read for me, but this one was laborious because of all the errors, since I'm the type who gets really distracted and frustrated when I see grammar and/or spelling errors in books. It also didn't help that, topic-wise, the author seemed to be all over the place, which made it even harder to follow what her main point was. At times, it appeared that she actually supported the "tiger mom" approach to parenting while other times, it felt like she was outraged at such a parenting style and was venting her frustrations with it. 

If you were to ask me whether I liked this book or not, I would have to answer "not really." Granted, the author did make a few good points when comparing the two styles of parenting, but those same points were talked about over and over again, to the point of being overly repetitive. From an originality perspective, there really wasn't anything said in this book that hadn't already been said previously by someone else (I personally didn't learn anything new). In fact, I actually felt like 99 pages was too long for what the author had to say – take out all the repetitive stuff and this book easily could have been half the length it was. Actually, at several points throughout the book, I kind of felt like I was reading someone's (poorly written) term paper rather than an actual published book.

Basically, this book isn't worth the time to read. For those who are interested in this topic, there are way better books out there that talk about parenting styles in the East vs West that are better written for one and also way more informative and entertaining.

(Read in January 2017)